mhicken September 18th, 2009
The “Cellared in Canada” (CIC) controversy (previously covered here) hit the news again in the last few days with a feature story on CTV News at Six (there’s a print story with the video here) as well as very prominent coverage in the Vancouver Sun. The CTV story explained B.C.’s lack of regulatory oversight on these wines and how the labelling and marketing of them can be misleading to consumers. Of the three major companies selling these wines in B.C., Mission Hill and Andrew Peller came off best as their bottles featured in the story did include fairly obvious country of origin labelling. Vincor got the worst publicity since its labels (including some for its Olympic wines - now changed to VQA) only identified that its wines were blended from domestic and imported wine in very small print on the back of the bottle.
The Vancouver Sun had extensive coverage this weekend with a front page block, long story on the front of the business section and analysis by Anthony Gismondi. The focus was on the misleading nature of the labelling. The LDB came off badly in the story by answering questions only via email and basically dodging the real issues.
In reality, most of these wines are overwhelmingly import juice since B.C. has no regulations on the content (which is rather scandalous in of itself). The end result of this is real unfairness because you end up with what is essentially imported wine being marketed as from British Columbia.
Update (Sep. 23, 2009): the Vancouver Sun ran follow up stories on these issues today including a front page business section story “Consumers Dumbfounded Over Faux BC Wines” and the lead editorial: BC Wineries Must Stop Their Deceptive Marketing Practices.
Update (Sep. 25, 2009): more coverage in the Vancouver Sun today: Winemakers fight for their product’s reputation. Also stories on last night’s BCTV/Global news and CTV news. This morning, there was also a feature story on CBC’s national radio show, the Current, featuring Jancis Robinson.
An additional point on the LDB’s involvement: the BC LDB makes little if any money on the sale of “real” BC wines because of the VQA rebate system. However, the LDB makes tons of money on the sale of CIC wines because there is no rebate on these products which are really imported and subject to full (117%) LDB markup.
As of yesterday, the LDB was still displaying Cellared in Canada wines underneath “British Columbia” signs in its downtown signature store. In my opinion, this is really a transparency issue - if the products were clearly labelled and marketed honestly, there would be no issue. Since most of the consumers for these products, buy on price, sales probably wouldn’t even be affected that much. In today’s world, transparency is critically important for product marketing and that’s the way to solve this problem.
Tags: andrew peller, bc, cellared in canada, laws, marketing, mission hill, regulations, vincor, wine